Drug patents are like all other
patents — they protect “new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or
composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof…” (USPTO.gov).
Note that patents do not give you the right to sell or use an
invention — only to block others from doing so. Accordingly, prior to receiving
marketing clearance in the United States drugs must be proven safe and
effective and pass review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
While advocates for open access often feel that patents impede
innovation, proponents of patents counter that patents enable people and
companies to offset the risk and expense of drug development by providing them
with temporary monopolies.
It is a bit of a chicken-and-egg scenario — no patents might
mean that there would be no innovative drugs, but excessive patent protection
could mean that drug companies would charge unaffordable prices.
There are several measures to maintain a balance (the deeper you
dig into this area the more you’ll find). Firstly, healthcare payers have caps
on how much they will reimburse drug companies for their drugs. So, the high
prices which are often cited are really just the retail price and not the final
negotiated price. Also, the FDA incentivizes generic companies to prove that
drug patents are invalid, giving them six months of generic exclusivity.
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét